The King's Fund
This report considers the difficulties of assessing the effectiveness of complementary practice. Despite the increasing popularity and use of complementary practice, the evidence base is small. Lack of research and lack of agreement on research methods has led to criticism from branches of conventional medicine.
Full Text
Friday, 28 August 2009
Assessing complementary practice: building consensus on appropriate research methods
Labels:
Complementary medicine,
Quality assurance,
research
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(147)
-
▼
August
(18)
- Is popcorn good for you?
- School lunch 'fresh better than frozen' claim misc...
- Key facts and trends in Mental Health
- Assessing complementary practice: building consens...
- Poor cancer symptom awareness
- Child leukemia genes found
- Chemotherapy services in England: ensuring quality...
- Chinese herb shows promise for arthritis
- Sudden infant deaths “tumbling”
- Legal highs set to be banned
- Behind the Headlines - Spotting ovarian cancer
- Campaign for smarter drinking
- 'Nanobees' for cancer
- Cancer incidence and survival by major ethnic group
- Food Route – a new lesson on food
- Depression in women may be in the genes
- We’re all in this together: improving the long-ter...
- Mothers’ experiences of bottle-feeding: a systemat...
-
▼
August
(18)
No comments:
Post a Comment